Here you'll create or edit a custom page for your Web site. Approaches to Bible interpretation vary. This doesn't make them all sensible or practical. Much like the interpretation of other texts, such as a historical piece of literature (say Homer's Iliad), some approaches make the reading normal, while others lead the reader in odd directions. It is no different in Bible interpretation. Prophecy Scholars League adheres to a historical, grammatical, literal approach, the same used for reading any other historical document. This necessarily leads us to accept certain views of prophecy and reject others. By analogy, a literal interpretation of Homer's work leads us to accept the Trojan war as a literal event, rather than a fanciful symbol of some other reality. The same can happen in Bible interpretation; taking the face-value of the words used by the author as symbolic without a reason to do so provided by the author, can lead readers to incorrect conclusions. This is at the heart of the reason for Prophecy Scholars League following scholarly principles; we are trying to avoid those basic pitfalls in hermeneutics (interpretation). |
||||
Distinguishing foreground from background, light from shadow
|
"Golden Rule" of Interpretation This rule was designed by a Bible scholar for ease of use; that is, easy to remember, not always easy to apply. The study of Scripture has been both rewarding and challenging for scholars for centuries. What this principle helps us do is maintain a solid starting point for extracting meaning from the text. Golden Rule of Interpretation: “When the plain sense of Scripture makes common sense, seek no other sense; therefore, take every word at its primary, ordinary, usual, literal meaning unless the facts of the immediate text, studied in light of related passages and axiomatic and fundamental truths, clearly indicate otherwise.” Source: David L. Cooper (1886-1965). An Exposition of the Book of Revelation (1972), Biblical Research Society, p. 9. This is the same principle of interpretation that is used to read any other historical text; this is why it is described as "normal," "ordinary" and "literal." This rule of interepretation is also described as historical, literal and grammatical. This is the rule to which the Prophecy Scholars League adheres in its approach to Bible study. John F. Walvoord, Th.M., Th.D. The Prophecy Knowledge Handbook. 1990. Victor Books, Basic principles of interpretation:
Special principles of interpretation when examining prophecy: (pp. 12-13)
|
|||
Hermeneutics Hermeneutics Defined: “The art of interpreting literature” (Chafer, 1947, p. 115) “The science and art of interpreting the Bible” (Zuck, Roy, 1991, The Basics of Bible Interpretation, Colorado Springs, CO: Victor, p. 10) Exegesis Defined, Described: Kay Arthur’s interpretive principles: Arthur, Kay, 1994. How to Study Your Bible. 1. Remember that context rules. 2. Always seek the full counsel of the Word. 3. Remember that Scripture will never contradict Scripture. 4. Do not base your doctrine on an obscure passage of Scripture. 5. Interpret Scripture literally. 6. Look for the Author’s intended meaning of the passage. 7. Check your conclusions by using reliable commentaries. Chafer’s “Rules and Principles of Procedure” in his Systematic Theology, Vol. I, 1947, 1. The purpose of the Bible as a whole. 2. The distinctive character and message of each book of the Bible. 3. To whom is a given Scripture addressed? 4. Consideration of the context. 5. Consideration of all Scripture bearing on any given theme. 6. Discovery of the exact meaning of the determinative words in the text. 7. Necessity of avoiding personal prejudices. Geoffrey W. Principles of Interpretation (1979), in The Expositor’s Bible Commentary, Vol. 1, Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, pp. 61-80. General Principles: 1. Objectivity. 2. Receptivity. 3. Heterocentricity. (finding a center outside the self) Technical Principles: 1. Natural Exegesis. 2. Scientific Aids. 3. Historical Study. Theological Principles: 1. Divine Authorship. 2. Christology. 3. The Role of the Spirit. 4. Scriptural Unity. Remaining problems of interpretation: 1. Interpretation is always reformable due to incompleteness of textual, lexical and historical knowledge. 2. Some decisions must be tenable but not regarded as definitive. 3. Opinion is unavoidable. 4. Cultural transplantion debates continue; it’s especially pertinent in determining the difference between central and peripheral. 5. Applying concept of Bible unity creates differences (i.e., dispensationalism, progressive revelation). 6. Sinfulness constantly militates against “true objectivity, receptivity, and reorientation” (Bromiley, 1979, p. 79). |
|
|||
|